Yesterday, Facebook started testing its answer to the "dislike button" in Spain and Ireland: a set of six animated emoji called "Reactions"--love, haha, yay, wow, sad, and angry. The emoji address a lot of what people have asked for on Facebook; specifically, a bit more nuance in how users can respond to posts. Here's what Chris Cox, Chief Product Officer at Facebook, had to say:
Today we’re launching a pilot test of Reactions — a more expressive Like button.
As you can see, it’s not a “dislike” button, though we hope it addresses the spirit of this request more broadly. We studied which comments and reactions are most commonly and universally expressed across Facebook, then worked to design an experience around them that was elegant and fun. Starting today Ireland and Spain can start loving, wow-ing, or expressing sympathy to posts on Facebook by hovering or long-pressing the Like button wherever they see it. We’ll use the feedback from this to improve the feature and hope to roll it out to everyone soon.
Today we’re launching a pilot test of Reactions — a more expressive Like button. As you can see, it’s not a “dislike” button, though we hope it addresses the spirit of this request more broadly. We studied which comments and reactions are most commonly and universally expressed across Facebook, then worked to design an experience around them that was elegant and fun. Starting today Ireland and Spain can start loving, wow-ing, or expressing sympathy to posts on Facebook by hovering or long-pressing the Like button wherever they see it. We’ll use the feedback from this to improve the feature and hope to roll it out to everyone soon.
Posted by Chris Cox on Thursday, October 8, 2015
This is a much smarter move than the more obvious and problematic option of a "dislike" button, for several reasons. One is context; "dislike" can refer to a friend's hard day, but is vulnerable to trolling or other (context-free) negativity. Another is range of expression. Even a set of six emoji can address a range of expressive options that a simple "like" or "share" couldn't do. (For more on how Facebook arrived at these options, and a couple of other fun nuggets, see Casey Newton's hilarious piece in The Verge.)
Of course, brands' first question will be how "Reactions" will affect ranking, a hot-button issue for some time now. Chris Tosswill, Facebook Product Manager, says on the Facebook blog that:
We see this as an opportunity for businesses and publishers to better understand how people are responding to their content on Facebook. During this test, Page owners will be able to see Reactions to all of their posts on Page insights. Reactions will have the same impact on ad delivery as Likes do.
But one of the more interesting aspects for me is what these six little guys mean from a brand strategy point of view. Here's why I think this was a smart move on Facebook's part:
True to Facebook's style, this is a test-and-learn process, as it should be (once they're available) for brands too. This also means there are a lot of as-yet unanswered questions: will brands be able to use these emoji outside Facebook? If so, when? And, more importantly, should they? Will they have a range of options in terms of what emoji they can use, or will they have to offer all six? As you can imagine, this can get complex fairly quickly.
It's also interesting to imagine our experience as consumers. For example, I could see using "angry" or "sad" emoji if a favorite item is out of stock, or "haha" for fashions I consider particularly ludicrous. Can I say "haha" if my flight is delayed? What does "wow" really mean? Six little faces can mean a lot of things, folks.
As a brand, I would be interested in benchmarking for a while to see what my "normal" looks like. Then I'd want to better understand cases where the emoji is actually being used in unexpected ways. And of course I'd want to compare "Reactions" to other signals. That's going to require some upfront thinking and scenario planning.
Of course, there are some interesting analytics options for media and other organizations. I can already see an "anger index" or even a "wow index" to compare reactions to news stories over time. I also wonder whether the team saw evidence for but sidelined the idea of a WTF emoji (or its more SFW cousin, WTH) because of its obvious trolling potential. But it sure would make for a great roundup story at the end of 2016. So I hereby lobby for some kind of "disbelief" emoji come 2016. I think "wow" may be our onramp for now.
But I'm getting ahead of myself. For now, this looks to be a solid first step toward providing more scalable expressive options for Facebook users, and more food for thought for brands as they plan their digital strategies.
Feel free to haha, yay, or wow in the comments.
The implications of Facebook’s new range of buttons.
Altimeter’s latest benchmark study on how companies are using social media to further their business results.
With “Buyable Pins,” brands can now use Pinterest to directly sell their products to consumers
DonorsChoose shows how simple targeted emails can produce great engagement across all digital channels.
What you need to know about Facebook’s newly launched workplace collaboration tool, and the impact it could have in a highly competitive space.
In our research and client work at Altimeter, one of the most misunderstood issues we see is social business governance.
When Facebook announced last week that it will soon become more difficult for brands’ page posts to appear in the news feeds of their friends, fans, and followers, the outcry was predictable.
Facebook is working on a new offering called Facebook at Work, according to the Financial Times.
Social selling has become a hot topic. Organizations in every industry are working feverishly to leverage social platforms and social networks for a number of reasons
Ten years ago today, I wrote my first blog post, entitled “Blogging as a State of Mind.”
What’s a digital newsroom? Seems like such a simple question, until you start pondering the potential answers.
It’s no corporate HR secret: the greater investment made into employees, the greater the ultimate reward back to the company.
How teens use social media and why it matters to you. Generation Z = (Today’s Teens, Preteens and Children)
During the past several years, the television industry has changed dramatically, spurred by device proliferation, changing distribution methods, and the increasing popularity of social media.
Late last year, I started wondering about social media command centers. Salesforce had launched one, as had Brandwatch, but I wondered: were they really still relevant? Were companies investing in command center deployments, or had interest subsided since their heyday in 2010?
Co-written with: Susan Etlinger, Rebecca Lieb, Andrew Jones, Linda Saindon, Brian Solis, and Ed Terpening The not-so-long awaited Twitter S-1 is out and now the intense scrutiny begins.
In this webinar, they discuss the seven factors that successful social businesses share and how their strategies are designed to deliver business value.
Businesses may be seen as having a “successful” social strategy by virtue of citations in case studies and speaking at conferences. But, by far, the best metric of success is concrete examples of how the organization creates business value via social technologies across multiple departments and dimensions of their business.