Friday afternoon, Buzzfeed published an article claiming that Twitter plans to introduce an algorithmic timeline as soon as this week, prompting such brouhaha that the hashtag #RIPTwitter trended throughout much of the weekend. Enraged users argued that it would bury small accounts and new users, favor brand over user content, be antithetical to the freedom and transparency of Twitter itself and, ultimately, make Twitter effectively indistinguishable from Facebook. Zeynep Tufecsi, Assistant Professor at UNC School of Information And Library Science, put it this way:
While these reports have not been confirmed by Twitter, they haven’t exactly been denied either. A series of tweets from CEO Jack Dorsey on Sunday afternoon began with the following:
The addition of “next week”—those apparently superfluous 11 characters—keeps the door open, but it’s important to look at other signals as well. The introduction of the “While You Were Away” feature last year could be interpreted as a trial run for an algorithmic timeline, as it is, in Twitter’s own words, “determined by engagement and other factors.”
While Twitter hasn’t specified what those other factors are, contenders could be signals such as follower count, popularity of keywords or hashtags, whether you’ve retweeted or favorited that person’s content, your connections to that person, and other attributes. Numerous reports that an algorithmic timeline is currently being tested add credence to the idea that something is likely afoot. For the purposes of this post, I’m not going to speculate any further on the “will-they-or-won’t-they?”, but it is important to think about why Twitter would make such a change and what might happen if it does. Instead, we’ll look at the impact on three critical constituencies: 1) users, 2) brands and 3) researchers.
Why Would Twitter Do This?
The simple answer is user growth. Twitter’s vulnerability (especially in comparison to Facebook) has been amply documented, and the company needs to make itself more attractive to advertisers by increasing the size of its user base and its stickiness. Filtering content by high engagement “and other factors” would arguably increase the signal-to-noise ratio, thereby appealing more to new users and therefore advertisers. There is plenty to say about 1) how this might work and 2) whether it would work, but that’s for another day.
User control is critical
The first question is whether an algorithmic timeline would be optional or not. If it’s optional, Twitter will likely design the user experience to encourage people to use it. Why? See above. It’s unlikely to be a complete switchover, although the hope would be that users prefer the algorithm over the real-time timeline and use that more frequently, which would theoretically teach the algorithm more about what they care about and surface ever more relevant content.
Organic reach and viewability are no longer a guarantee
As on Facebook, users who publish tweets would not automatically be assured that all their followers are able to see them. Of course, given the velocity of the timeline (especially for people who follow a lot of people), there is never an absolute guarantee, but the algorithm’s function is to favor some tweets over others, so organic reach would no longer be a reliable metric.
Potential to erode trust
Granted, the #RIPTwitter hashtag is by its nature an extremely biased sample, but one of the implicit themes in the tweets is an erosion of trust—to be an open exchange and a place where events of national and global significance (#ArabSpring, #BlackLivesMatter, #Ferguson) unfold organically in real time. While “trust” is difficult to measure, loyalty is not, and erosion of the user base, particularly the most influential users, would be dire.
Do users know what’s best for them?
Another of the themes in the #RIPTwitter backlash, on both sides, is the question as to whether users actually do know what is best for them. As this writer for BBC News accurately points out, “If [Jack Dorsey] looks at the history of Facebook, he will see that just about every innovation introduced by Mark Zuckerberg has met with dismay from existing users.”
A tweet from Bret Taylor, former Facebook CTO, echoes this thought from another angle: “Algorithmic feed was always the thing people said they didn't want but demonstrated they did via every conceivable metric. It's just better.” But not every user feels this way, or is likely to act on it. One user wrote, “I don’t want to see tweets YOU DECIDE I want to see. I’m a big girl and can navigate my feed all by myself.” Facebook has been able to navigate this balance, but it is unclear whether Twitter is in a position to do so.
Uncertain insight metrics
One of the main reasons brands use Twitter is to discover insights from users. This is much more reliable (but never 100% certain) with a real-time feed. Some brands currently have access to the entire Twitter “firehose” via social analytics partners, and this would conceivably continue, but the sheer existence of an algorithmic timeline would change the nature of the feed itself. For example, some critics have expressed concern that some events that trend in a real-time timeline would no longer do so with an algorithmic one. If, for example, one of the ingredients in the algorithm is social influence, that possibility could be magnified, especially for less “influential” users.
Uncertain reach/viewability metrics
One of the challenges Facebook faces with advertisers relates to reach (or with video, “viewability”) metrics; that is, the ability to know how many people have theoretically seen a particular piece of content within a particular time frame. With a real-time feed based on follower counts, this is a relatively simple equation, even when adjusted for the fact that people don’t sit in front of their computers/mobile devices all day (yet!).
With an algorithm, however, there is no way to know exactly how many people saw a particular piece of content, which has made ad buying a bit of a delicate dance. This panel from the Clean Ads I/O Conference last year lays out these issues quite effectively in context of Facebook. Is Twitter ready to enter this fray with advertisers? I’m not sure they are; Facebook has the benefit of more than one billion daily active users to bolster its negotiating power.
Uncertain value proposition
While it seems logical on its face that an algorithmic feed would give Twitter some of the advantages of Facebook, the opposite may well be true. Twitter’s appeal is its real-time nature; replacing it with an algorithm undermines the platform’s main differentiator. At the same time, it would bring Twitter into more direct competition with Facebook, and with many fewer and less developed features to compete with. My take is that, as a brand manager, it still wouldn’t change the value proposition in Twitter’s favor. That requires a much higher level of innovation than Twitter has shown during the past several years.
My Big Boulder Initiative colleague Farida Vis (@flygirltwo) has written a must-read blog post for the London School of Economics blog, unpacking the potential impacts of feature changes on research and arguing for researchers to be “more data and platform resilient”. One brief example is as follows:
In a research context…feature changes can have all sorts of implications for data collection and analysis. Take for example a news context: would users ‘heart’ a tweet about a recent terrorist attack in the same way they might have ‘faved’ it for later reading or for use in a news story? The way in which users engage with these features should of course be taken on board in analysis, but is harder to do as changes are rolled out and happen during data collection and user communities don’t adopt new features as expected. Feature changes have long represented a significant methodological challenge to researchers.
This applies both to academic and business research, as feature changes, if not identified and adjusted for, can wreak havoc on any type of analysis.
All of this said, I’m personally ambivalent about the prospect of an algorithmic timeline on Twitter. I have used the service daily for nine years and consider myself a committed user. So many of the most powerful events and movements of the last decade have unfolded in 140-character bursts, educating me about issues and points of view I might never have been exposed to otherwise. That is irreplaceable, and I’m grateful for it.
As an analyst, however, I’m frustrated by the innovation slump that the company has been in. Twitter has assets unlike any other on the planet, and the company needs to be able to monetize that. Is an algorithmic feed the answer? I am skeptical, but acknowledge that all of this is theoretical until we see real news from the company. But one thing is certain: I really hope Twitter takes an unsparing look at the data from #RIPTwitter and uses it to make its next move one that brands, researchers and users alike will benefit from.
Charlene Li takes a look at what areas of digital transformation companies should invest in as the year begins.
Lessons from the digital disruption of the music industry.
A new survey from CMO Council and Pega Systems shows that data-driven customer engagement still has a long way to go.
Altimeter’s Susan Etlinger is a guest contributor to a new report from the World Economic Forum, prepared by the Global Agenda Council for Social Media.
The new areas of focus for Altimeter’s research team in the New Year.
Watch the recorded webinar and download the slides of Altimeter’s presentation of “The Customer Experience Cloud”
A new book by Altimeter’s Brian Solis underscores the importance of great design and empathy in creating lasting customer experiences.
A new Altimeter report gives companies a roadmap for unifying their teams and technologies around building a unified customer experience across all brand interactions.
Customer experience is no longer just the responsibility of marketing, martech must be used by the sales and service teams as well.
Brian Solis talks about marketing to Generation “C” at the Adobe Summit EMEA in London.
How to get your business noticed in a sea of content and media.
Oracle announces long-awaited web, data, and commerce integrations for its Marketing Cloud, highlighting its big ambitions for a unified offering of all its enterprise platforms.
I recently partnered with Genesys to explore the state and future of customer experience (CX).
Sprinklr is taking on the marketing cloud bigwigs with the release of its Content Lifecycle Management platform.
We answer all the questions we couldn’t get to during our webinar on the mobile-only customer experience.
Why it’s not enough to simple be present on every digital channel
The essential steps you need to take to start building your customers’ mobile experiences.
Consumers will soon demand mobile-only experiences from the brands that engage them. Our report identifies the steps companies can take to start thriving in this new reality.
These last few years have been an interesting ride. As fun as it has been, it is the next few years that will be the most telling and also transformative if all goes according to plan.
When I published the first in a new series of reports exploring the state and future of Digital Transformation, it was almost the antithesis of a typical technology report.
Every day, there’s seemingly yet another disruptive trend that emerges out of nowhere which affects consumer behavior and the future of everything along with it.
As we didn’t have time to answer all viewer questions after the 2014 State of Digital Transformation webinar, we’ve included our responses to the top inquiries here.
Altimeter and Capgemini Consulting to Collaborate on Thought Leadership, Research, and Global Consulting
Altimeter’s recent research for its report, The 2014 State of Digital Transformation, uncovered that investing in new digital technologies (social, mobile, big data, cloud, etc.) doesn’t always equate to uniting those efforts around a common vision supported by an updated, integrated infrastructure.
As part of our open research process, I would like to extend an invite for your input, feedback, case examples, or any other insights you’d like to contribute to our upcoming research around the Internet of Things.
In this one-hour webinar, Brian Solis shares research on how businesses explore digital transformation, including results from a 2014 survey of leading digital strategists.
Digital Darwinism is a fate that threatens most organizations in almost every industry. Because of this, businesses not only have to compete for today but also for the unforeseeable future.
I follow the Maker Movement as a consumer, analyst and also as a maker. What is the maker movement?
Businesses today are met with unique challenges and opportunities that necessitate pause. For years, management models were developed to optimize the pursuit of business objectives.
Pervasive technology fundamentally changes how people communicate, discover and connect. With smartphones and tablets serving as digital appendages, we focus on small screens throughout our day, every day and in all we do.
There’s a lot of talk about the future of work… Technology is indeed connecting us in ways that improve communication, discovery and connectivity.
Today, I’m proud to announce the release of Altimeter Group’s second report on Digital Transformation. This new report is aimed at executives and digital strategists to help them (you) further understand the state of digital transformation as you plan your next steps and investments.
Silicon Valley is more than a place, it’s a movement. While many debate where the “next” Silicon Valley will gain prominence, the point that many onlookers miss is that innovation is at the heart of the crusade.
Thank you to everyone who joined us for Tuesday’s webinar on Digital Transformation. We had an excellent turnout from around the globe and received a lot of great questions throughout Brian’s presentation.
“Digital transformation” isn’t a trendy moniker to signify an increase in technology investment. It’s a renewed focus on the customer and the human side of business.
To learn more about the state of social media command centers, Altimeter Group spoke with three organizations — MasterCard, eBay, and Wells Fargo Bank.
As we launch into 2014, the analysts at Altimeter each pulled together a compilation of trends and issues they are watching closely this year.
Adobe Marketing Summit and Oracle OpenWorld both took place recently. It’s another month until Dreamforce, but I expect similar announcements to be made there.
This report defines the Collaborative Economy, looks at companies that are already moving into this space, and provides a framework, the Collaborative Economy Value Chain, which companies can use to help rethink their business models.
Over 30 Technologies Have Emerged, at a Faster Pace than Companies Can Digest. If you think social was disruptive, it was really just the beginning.
In 2011, the US hit a milestone — more than half of all adults visit social networking sites at least once a month. But when it comes to using social-networking technologies inside organizations, many business leaders are at a loss to understand what value can be created from Facebook-like status updates within the enterprise.
The End of Business As Usual explores each layer of the complex consumer revolution that is changing the future of business, media, and culture. As consumers further connect with one another, a vast and efficient information network takes shape and begins to steer experiences, decisions, and markets. It is nothing short of disruptive.
What’s a crises? We did analysis on the list of social media crises aka “punkings” to find out what went wrong, why, and what should have been done.
Engage! examines the social media landscape and how to effectively use social media to succeed in business—one network and one tool at a time. It leads you through the detailed and specific steps required for conceptualizing, implementing, managing, and measuring a social media program.