Friday afternoon, Buzzfeed published an article claiming that Twitter plans to introduce an algorithmic timeline as soon as this week, prompting such brouhaha that the hashtag #RIPTwitter trended throughout much of the weekend. Enraged users argued that it would bury small accounts and new users, favor brand over user content, be antithetical to the freedom and transparency of Twitter itself and, ultimately, make Twitter effectively indistinguishable from Facebook. Zeynep Tufecsi, Assistant Professor at UNC School of Information And Library Science, put it this way:
While these reports have not been confirmed by Twitter, they haven’t exactly been denied either. A series of tweets from CEO Jack Dorsey on Sunday afternoon began with the following:
The addition of “next week”—those apparently superfluous 11 characters—keeps the door open, but it’s important to look at other signals as well. The introduction of the “While You Were Away” feature last year could be interpreted as a trial run for an algorithmic timeline, as it is, in Twitter’s own words, “determined by engagement and other factors.”
While Twitter hasn’t specified what those other factors are, contenders could be signals such as follower count, popularity of keywords or hashtags, whether you’ve retweeted or favorited that person’s content, your connections to that person, and other attributes. Numerous reports that an algorithmic timeline is currently being tested add credence to the idea that something is likely afoot. For the purposes of this post, I’m not going to speculate any further on the “will-they-or-won’t-they?”, but it is important to think about why Twitter would make such a change and what might happen if it does. Instead, we’ll look at the impact on three critical constituencies: 1) users, 2) brands and 3) researchers.
Why Would Twitter Do This?
The simple answer is user growth. Twitter’s vulnerability (especially in comparison to Facebook) has been amply documented, and the company needs to make itself more attractive to advertisers by increasing the size of its user base and its stickiness. Filtering content by high engagement “and other factors” would arguably increase the signal-to-noise ratio, thereby appealing more to new users and therefore advertisers. There is plenty to say about 1) how this might work and 2) whether it would work, but that’s for another day.
User control is critical
The first question is whether an algorithmic timeline would be optional or not. If it’s optional, Twitter will likely design the user experience to encourage people to use it. Why? See above. It’s unlikely to be a complete switchover, although the hope would be that users prefer the algorithm over the real-time timeline and use that more frequently, which would theoretically teach the algorithm more about what they care about and surface ever more relevant content.
Organic reach and viewability are no longer a guarantee
As on Facebook, users who publish tweets would not automatically be assured that all their followers are able to see them. Of course, given the velocity of the timeline (especially for people who follow a lot of people), there is never an absolute guarantee, but the algorithm’s function is to favor some tweets over others, so organic reach would no longer be a reliable metric.
Potential to erode trust
Granted, the #RIPTwitter hashtag is by its nature an extremely biased sample, but one of the implicit themes in the tweets is an erosion of trust—to be an open exchange and a place where events of national and global significance (#ArabSpring, #BlackLivesMatter, #Ferguson) unfold organically in real time. While “trust” is difficult to measure, loyalty is not, and erosion of the user base, particularly the most influential users, would be dire.
Do users know what’s best for them?
Another of the themes in the #RIPTwitter backlash, on both sides, is the question as to whether users actually do know what is best for them. As this writer for BBC News accurately points out, “If [Jack Dorsey] looks at the history of Facebook, he will see that just about every innovation introduced by Mark Zuckerberg has met with dismay from existing users.”
A tweet from Bret Taylor, former Facebook CTO, echoes this thought from another angle: “Algorithmic feed was always the thing people said they didn't want but demonstrated they did via every conceivable metric. It's just better.” But not every user feels this way, or is likely to act on it. One user wrote, “I don’t want to see tweets YOU DECIDE I want to see. I’m a big girl and can navigate my feed all by myself.” Facebook has been able to navigate this balance, but it is unclear whether Twitter is in a position to do so.
Uncertain insight metrics
One of the main reasons brands use Twitter is to discover insights from users. This is much more reliable (but never 100% certain) with a real-time feed. Some brands currently have access to the entire Twitter “firehose” via social analytics partners, and this would conceivably continue, but the sheer existence of an algorithmic timeline would change the nature of the feed itself. For example, some critics have expressed concern that some events that trend in a real-time timeline would no longer do so with an algorithmic one. If, for example, one of the ingredients in the algorithm is social influence, that possibility could be magnified, especially for less “influential” users.
Uncertain reach/viewability metrics
One of the challenges Facebook faces with advertisers relates to reach (or with video, “viewability”) metrics; that is, the ability to know how many people have theoretically seen a particular piece of content within a particular time frame. With a real-time feed based on follower counts, this is a relatively simple equation, even when adjusted for the fact that people don’t sit in front of their computers/mobile devices all day (yet!).
With an algorithm, however, there is no way to know exactly how many people saw a particular piece of content, which has made ad buying a bit of a delicate dance. This panel from the Clean Ads I/O Conference last year lays out these issues quite effectively in context of Facebook. Is Twitter ready to enter this fray with advertisers? I’m not sure they are; Facebook has the benefit of more than one billion daily active users to bolster its negotiating power.
Uncertain value proposition
While it seems logical on its face that an algorithmic feed would give Twitter some of the advantages of Facebook, the opposite may well be true. Twitter’s appeal is its real-time nature; replacing it with an algorithm undermines the platform’s main differentiator. At the same time, it would bring Twitter into more direct competition with Facebook, and with many fewer and less developed features to compete with. My take is that, as a brand manager, it still wouldn’t change the value proposition in Twitter’s favor. That requires a much higher level of innovation than Twitter has shown during the past several years.
My Big Boulder Initiative colleague Farida Vis (@flygirltwo) has written a must-read blog post for the London School of Economics blog, unpacking the potential impacts of feature changes on research and arguing for researchers to be “more data and platform resilient”. One brief example is as follows:
In a research context…feature changes can have all sorts of implications for data collection and analysis. Take for example a news context: would users ‘heart’ a tweet about a recent terrorist attack in the same way they might have ‘faved’ it for later reading or for use in a news story? The way in which users engage with these features should of course be taken on board in analysis, but is harder to do as changes are rolled out and happen during data collection and user communities don’t adopt new features as expected. Feature changes have long represented a significant methodological challenge to researchers.
This applies both to academic and business research, as feature changes, if not identified and adjusted for, can wreak havoc on any type of analysis.
All of this said, I’m personally ambivalent about the prospect of an algorithmic timeline on Twitter. I have used the service daily for nine years and consider myself a committed user. So many of the most powerful events and movements of the last decade have unfolded in 140-character bursts, educating me about issues and points of view I might never have been exposed to otherwise. That is irreplaceable, and I’m grateful for it.
As an analyst, however, I’m frustrated by the innovation slump that the company has been in. Twitter has assets unlike any other on the planet, and the company needs to be able to monetize that. Is an algorithmic feed the answer? I am skeptical, but acknowledge that all of this is theoretical until we see real news from the company. But one thing is certain: I really hope Twitter takes an unsparing look at the data from #RIPTwitter and uses it to make its next move one that brands, researchers and users alike will benefit from.
A new survey from CMO Council and Pega Systems shows that data-driven customer engagement still has a long way to go.
Prophet’s Brand Relevance Index study identified the Top 50 Relentlessly Relevant Brand. Several digital brands broke into the top 50 — what did they do well to make it into this elite group of brands?
A new Altimeter report gives companies a roadmap for unifying their teams and technologies around building a unified customer experience across all brand interactions.
Sprinklr is taking on the marketing cloud bigwigs with the release of its Content Lifecycle Management platform.
Takeaways from all the advertising we saw on Super Bowl Sunday.
Things you need to know before you consider spending on Snapchat.
Consumers will soon demand mobile-only experiences from the brands that engage them. Our report identifies the steps companies can take to start thriving in this new reality.
What will 2015 bring marketers? Rather than look into a crystal ball, we have only to look at the present.
Employees are disengaged at work, and organizations have been exploring how social and digital technologies can address this problem.
What goes into the marketing process today, and what technology is required? Will a “Marketing Cloud” help coordinate efforts and drive efficiency? What are the alternatives?
According to Wikipedia, “marketing is the process of communicating the value of a product to customers, for the purpose of selling that product (goods or services.)” But that is what marketing used to be
Marketers are struggling with a customer journey that has become more complex than ever. The journey is difficult to track across channels and devices. The infographic below illustrates the modern marketing cycle…
This week, Facebook re-launched Atlas, the ad platform it bought from Microsoft last year.
Yesterday, Oracle’s new CTO Larry Ellison kicked off OpenWorld. He focused significantly on the cloud. How are the two themes related?
In this one-hour webinar, Brian Solis shares research on how businesses explore digital transformation, including results from a 2014 survey of leading digital strategists.
Pervasive technology fundamentally changes how people communicate, discover and connect. With smartphones and tablets serving as digital appendages, we focus on small screens throughout our day, every day and in all we do.
Today, I’m proud to announce the release of Altimeter Group’s second report on Digital Transformation. This new report is aimed at executives and digital strategists to help them (you) further understand the state of digital transformation as you plan your next steps and investments.
How teens use social media and why it matters to you. Generation Z = (Today’s Teens, Preteens and Children)
Today, I’m happy to announce the publication of my research report, Leveraging Social Identity: Know and Engage Customers Better to Build More Valuable Relationships.
Salesforce just announced the release of its Social Studio, an enterprise social relationship platform.
Thank you to everyone who joined us for Tuesday’s webinar on Digital Transformation. We had an excellent turnout from around the globe and received a lot of great questions throughout Brian’s presentation.
Today Sprinklr is announcing the availability of a paid media offering as well as a $40M in series D funding led by Iconiq Capital (which notably manages money for many of Facebook’s early employees, among others).
Marketing has changed substantially in the past few decades. With the proliferation of CRM, ecommerce, cookies, loyalty programs, etc. marketers have more customer data than ever.
IBM officially joined the Marketing Cloud battle today, with the news that it is acquiring marketing automation vendor SilverPop.
“Digital transformation” isn’t a trendy moniker to signify an increase in technology investment. It’s a renewed focus on the customer and the human side of business.
To learn more about the state of social media command centers, Altimeter Group spoke with three organizations — MasterCard, eBay, and Wells Fargo Bank.
Rebecca Lieb shares findings from her recent research report on real-time marketing, including the top 6 use cases, the benefits and risks, and 12 best practices.
Two things: To stay competitive with (or arguably ahead of) the giants in the social world—Salesforce, Adobe, and Oracle—Sprinklr needed to build out its analytics capabilities. Sprinklr’s customers increasingly need custom consulting services, especially for implementation and training.
Facebook may be losing teens (/the cool kids), but contrary to some beliefs, 2014 will not be a dire year for the company.
As we launch into 2014, the analysts at Altimeter each pulled together a compilation of trends and issues they are watching closely this year.
As digital channels operate increasingly in the ‘now,’ all marketing organizations must consider to what degree they will function in real-time, and even define what real-time is relative to their operations and marketing organization.
Adobe Marketing Summit and Oracle OpenWorld both took place recently. It’s another month until Dreamforce, but I expect similar announcements to be made there.
What is native advertising and, by extension, what is it not?
In this report, industry analyst Susan Etlinger demonstrates how leading organizations are deriving actionable intelligence from a holistic view of social and enterprise data.
This report defines the Collaborative Economy, looks at companies that are already moving into this space, and provides a framework, the Collaborative Economy Value Chain, which companies can use to help rethink their business models.
By now you’ve more than heard about Yahoo’s massive $1.1 billion acquisition of Tumblr. The deal is done, another Internet entrepreneur and early employees become multimillionaires, Marissa Mayer’s Yahoo earns a new shot at digital relevance, and hundreds of millions of Tumblr users go about their Tumbling life as if it were just another day.
Over 30 Technologies Have Emerged, at a Faster Pace than Companies Can Digest. If you think social was disruptive, it was really just the beginning.
In the late 20th century, when the commercial internet was in its infancy, there was no end to the griping about “silos.” Back then silos referred to That Which Is Digital and That Which Is Not Digital. The gripe (from the digital side of the equation) was that the not-digital team got all the budget, […]
The potential for social influence is enormous on both sides of the equation. Services that rank and identify “influence” open the door to new opportunities for businesses to cultivate mutually beneficial relationships with digital tastemakers and authorities.
Have you read my report, “Make An App For That, Mobile Strategies For Retailers” yet? If so, and you didn’t have a chance to tune into today’s webinar, I want to share the content with you to use, share and discuss.
2011 was the year of the mobile shopper, so why aren’t retailers doing more to serve them? Today Altimeter Research has published its latest report, Make An App For That: Mobile Strategies For Retail.
Get account control now –or risk a career of continual social media sanitation. To match the growing consumer adoption of social media, many companies have launched social media efforts with little planning.
The End of Business As Usual explores each layer of the complex consumer revolution that is changing the future of business, media, and culture. As consumers further connect with one another, a vast and efficient information network takes shape and begins to steer experiences, decisions, and markets. It is nothing short of disruptive.
Engage! examines the social media landscape and how to effectively use social media to succeed in business—one network and one tool at a time. It leads you through the detailed and specific steps required for conceptualizing, implementing, managing, and measuring a social media program.
In 2009, a subset of the marketing-focused chapters were published as “Marketing In The Groundswell.”
Putting the Public Back in Public Relations is a crucial guidebook for helping brands navigate the social economy, while enhancing your career and future in the process.
Now Is Gone seeks to help businesses embrace Social Media intelligently. Readers can learn if their organization is ready, how to begin, the predominant participation is marketing approach that other businesses are using, social media marketing strategies, and general social media insights.