Each year, Edelman conducts research that culminates in the publication of its Trust Barometer (disclosure: I worked at Edelman when the first report was published). It's been long enough now--15 years and counting--that the study has seen meaningful shifts in patterns of trust: of governments, NGOs, business and business leaders. We've seen these shifts through the lens of many significant geopolitical events: the 1999 "Battle in Seattle," the war in Iraq, and the great recession of 2007-2008 are some examples.
But this year's results have troubling implications for the technology industry in particular. According to the report, "[F]or the first time since the end of the Great Recession, trust in business faltered." Technology, while still the most trusted of industries at 78 percent, experienced declines in many countries across multiple sectors. Trust in the consumer electronics sector fell across 74 percent of countries, trust in the telecommunication sector fell in 67 percent of countries, and, "in 70 percent of countries trust in technology in general sank."
But most troubling of all were the findings about trust in innovation. Granted, this was the first time that Edelman has asked this particular set of questions, but it likely won't be the last. And it sets a useful baseline against which to measure and better understand how the general population feels about the nature and pace of innovation over time.
The finding--that 51 percent of respondents feel the pace of innovation is "too fast"--is worth unpacking, especially as it varies substantially among industries. One of the findings I found most interesting: trust in a particular sector--healthcare or financial services, for example--does not guarantee that the innovations in that sector are also trusted. Consider financial services (trust at 54 percent overall) compared to electronic payments (62 percent, up 8 percent), or Food & Beverage, (a 67 percent overall level of trust, compared to 30 percent for GMO foods). Of course, these numbers change dramatically as one views them across regions, from developed to developing countries, for example.
Even with the high overall levels of trust in the technology industry, we cannot sit comfortably and assume that there is a "trust dividend" that we can collect as we continue to work on topics from cloud computing to big data to artificial intelligence.
While we don't have data that specifically links levels of trust in technology and innovation to Edward Snowden's NSA revelations, or recent corporate data breaches, we do have evidence as to what kinds of behaviors affect perceptions of trust.
Unsurprisingly, integrity and engagement are the winners.
From there, you don't need a map to get to the value of integrating trust into everything we do as an industry, or, more accurately, a collection of many, interrelated industries. Here is how Edelman reported respondents' actions based on levels of trust:
And this is where we have to turn to the inevitable question: what are the ingredients in the ROI of trust? Based on the implicit and explicit findings above, I'd propose the following list of metrics, for starters:
The next step, of course, is to take those twin behaviors--integrity and engagement--and drill down so that we really understand what moves the needle one way or another. That will be a continuing topic for upcoming research and blog posts.
This year’s results have troubling implications for the technology industry.
In this one-hour webinar, Susan Etlinger shares a framework on how to 1) extract insight from data and 2) in a way that engenders trust.
A look at what we give up and gain when we allow our lives to be turned into sources for data.
Highlights of what the Big Boulder Initiative accomplished in 2014, and its plans for the new year.
A look at the best new startups to graduate from Alchemist Accelerator, an accelerator for enterprise collaboration tools.
This document is just a first step toward setting context for the many disruptions of ubiquitous and complex data, but it includes preliminary frameworks to help us examine these issues in more detail.
In my last post, I discussed some themes for 2015, one of which was an imperative for us as an industry to get serious about digital ethics.
I’m not generally a fan of annual predictions; they always remind me of a carnival in which you’re encouraged to “pay no attention to the man behind the curtain”; you almost never win the giant teddy bear.
In a moving talk, she explains why, as we receive more and more data, we need to deepen our critical thinking skills.
Marketers are struggling with a customer journey that has become more complex than ever. The journey is difficult to track across channels and devices. The infographic below illustrates the modern marketing cycle…
As part of our open research process, I would like to extend an invite for your input, feedback, case examples, or any other insights you’d like to contribute to our upcoming research around the Internet of Things.
In this one-hour webinar, analyst Susan Etlinger explores the phenomenon of “TV Everywhere” and shares findings from her recent report, Data Everywhere.
In this one-hour webinar, analysts Andrew Jones and Charlene Li share how insights can be gleaned from social media.
During the past several years, the television industry has changed dramatically, spurred by device proliferation, changing distribution methods, and the increasing popularity of social media.
Social Media Examiner’s 2014 annual Marketing Industry Report found that while 97% of marketers use social media in their marketing efforts, only 37% are able to measure the ROI of those activities.
Modern marketing requires deeper customer understanding to drive meaningful engagement. With social media — and the abundance of social profile and activity data — brands can glean this insight to identify and better understand prospects and customers throughout the customer lifecycle.
Today, I’m happy to announce the publication of my research report, Leveraging Social Identity: Know and Engage Customers Better to Build More Valuable Relationships.
To learn more about the state of social media command centers, Altimeter Group spoke with three organizations — MasterCard, eBay, and Wells Fargo Bank.
Late last year, I started wondering about social media command centers. Salesforce had launched one, as had Brandwatch, but I wondered: were they really still relevant? Were companies investing in command center deployments, or had interest subsided since their heyday in 2010?
Your refrigerator has a message for you — and no, it’s not that you need more orange juice– it’s an ad for belly fat pills. Thanks, Refrigerator. This post was originally posted on Wearable World News. The original can be found here.
At the most basic level, the Internet of Things (IoT) is connectivity between people, processes and things. While this is as vast as it sounds — spanning all industries, the enterprise, and consumers — one of the central-most challenges facing…
As we launch into 2014, the analysts at Altimeter each pulled together a compilation of trends and issues they are watching closely this year.
Customer attention will continue to fragment in 2014, making it harder than ever for brands to engage with customers. But it will also be the year in which brands capitalize on a largely untapped opportunity presented by social media…
In the past year, social data has continued to wend its way into organizations of all types, from large enterprise to small business to media and entertainment and the public sector. We’ve seen use cases far past marketing into product and service quality, entertainment programming, customer service, fraud detection and a host of other examples.
In this report, industry analyst Susan Etlinger demonstrates how leading organizations are deriving actionable intelligence from a holistic view of social and enterprise data.
I’ve taught more than 300 professionals Social Business through hands-on workshops, and happy to announce new workshops from Altimeter Academy focused on Content Marketing and Social Business Analytics.
I spend a lot of time reading and thinking about social data: what it is, what it isn’t, how to measure it, where it’s going.
This post originally appeared on my Altimeter analyst Jeremiah Owyang’s Web Strategy Blog By Chris Silva and Jeremiah Owyang, Industry Analysts at Altimeter Group Last year’s over hyped skydiving was replaced by down to earth by grounded product enhancements.
Over 30 Technologies Have Emerged, at a Faster Pace than Companies Can Digest. If you think social was disruptive, it was really just the beginning.
The volatility of social data and the pace of change mean that tried-and-true measurement methods are no longer enough. Social data is different.
Everyone talks about the challenges of measuring the revenue impact of social media, but how are top brands actually doing it? And are they successfully measuring ROI?
Wherever I go, the question I hear most often is this: “What is the ROI of social media?” Even though most companies we’ve surveyed have a brand monitoring solution in place, few have yet to crack the measurement code. It remains one of the most stubborn challenges for the social business.
While numerous social media measurement technologies exist, no single tool can adequately measure and provide insights for all social marketing activity.