Yesterday, Facebook started testing its answer to the "dislike button" in Spain and Ireland: a set of six animated emoji called "Reactions"--love, haha, yay, wow, sad, and angry. The emoji address a lot of what people have asked for on Facebook; specifically, a bit more nuance in how users can respond to posts. Here's what Chris Cox, Chief Product Officer at Facebook, had to say:
Today we’re launching a pilot test of Reactions — a more expressive Like button.
As you can see, it’s not a “dislike” button, though we hope it addresses the spirit of this request more broadly. We studied which comments and reactions are most commonly and universally expressed across Facebook, then worked to design an experience around them that was elegant and fun. Starting today Ireland and Spain can start loving, wow-ing, or expressing sympathy to posts on Facebook by hovering or long-pressing the Like button wherever they see it. We’ll use the feedback from this to improve the feature and hope to roll it out to everyone soon.
Today we’re launching a pilot test of Reactions — a more expressive Like button. As you can see, it’s not a “dislike” button, though we hope it addresses the spirit of this request more broadly. We studied which comments and reactions are most commonly and universally expressed across Facebook, then worked to design an experience around them that was elegant and fun. Starting today Ireland and Spain can start loving, wow-ing, or expressing sympathy to posts on Facebook by hovering or long-pressing the Like button wherever they see it. We’ll use the feedback from this to improve the feature and hope to roll it out to everyone soon.
Posted by Chris Cox on Thursday, October 8, 2015
This is a much smarter move than the more obvious and problematic option of a "dislike" button, for several reasons. One is context; "dislike" can refer to a friend's hard day, but is vulnerable to trolling or other (context-free) negativity. Another is range of expression. Even a set of six emoji can address a range of expressive options that a simple "like" or "share" couldn't do. (For more on how Facebook arrived at these options, and a couple of other fun nuggets, see Casey Newton's hilarious piece in The Verge.)
Of course, brands' first question will be how "Reactions" will affect ranking, a hot-button issue for some time now. Chris Tosswill, Facebook Product Manager, says on the Facebook blog that:
We see this as an opportunity for businesses and publishers to better understand how people are responding to their content on Facebook. During this test, Page owners will be able to see Reactions to all of their posts on Page insights. Reactions will have the same impact on ad delivery as Likes do.
But one of the more interesting aspects for me is what these six little guys mean from a brand strategy point of view. Here's why I think this was a smart move on Facebook's part:
True to Facebook's style, this is a test-and-learn process, as it should be (once they're available) for brands too. This also means there are a lot of as-yet unanswered questions: will brands be able to use these emoji outside Facebook? If so, when? And, more importantly, should they? Will they have a range of options in terms of what emoji they can use, or will they have to offer all six? As you can imagine, this can get complex fairly quickly.
It's also interesting to imagine our experience as consumers. For example, I could see using "angry" or "sad" emoji if a favorite item is out of stock, or "haha" for fashions I consider particularly ludicrous. Can I say "haha" if my flight is delayed? What does "wow" really mean? Six little faces can mean a lot of things, folks.
As a brand, I would be interested in benchmarking for a while to see what my "normal" looks like. Then I'd want to better understand cases where the emoji is actually being used in unexpected ways. And of course I'd want to compare "Reactions" to other signals. That's going to require some upfront thinking and scenario planning.
Of course, there are some interesting analytics options for media and other organizations. I can already see an "anger index" or even a "wow index" to compare reactions to news stories over time. I also wonder whether the team saw evidence for but sidelined the idea of a WTF emoji (or its more SFW cousin, WTH) because of its obvious trolling potential. But it sure would make for a great roundup story at the end of 2016. So I hereby lobby for some kind of "disbelief" emoji come 2016. I think "wow" may be our onramp for now.
But I'm getting ahead of myself. For now, this looks to be a solid first step toward providing more scalable expressive options for Facebook users, and more food for thought for brands as they plan their digital strategies.
Feel free to haha, yay, or wow in the comments.
The implications of Facebook’s new range of buttons.
Companies need to look beyond communication to earn consumer trust.
How much further can we take the “customer profile?”
What you need to know about how companies can use your data to discriminate against you.
What you should keep in mind when evaluating your company’s social business maturity.
What both consumers and businesses can learn from the Ashley Madison cheating website data breach.
The way Pinterest discloses its data use practices is a great example for brands.
The essential guidelines all businesses need to follow for the ethical collection, use and sale of data.
Was Twitter wrong for taking down “Politwoops?”
The Apple CEO delivered a scathing critique of companies misusing customer information.
If customer experience is based upon data, the first step is earning their trust.
The implications of Twitter turning off the tap for one of its biggest data partners.
Why the competition between the big marketing cloud vendors shouldn’t be the focus of their clients.
A look at the digital ethics and privacy conversations from this year’s SXSW conference.
A new law banning the collection of personal information in South Africa could influence legislation in other countries as well.
This year’s results have troubling implications for the technology industry.
A look at what we give up and gain when we allow our lives to be turned into sources for data.
Here are five data questions about the Super Bowl that we’d like the answer to.
Highlights of what the Big Boulder Initiative accomplished in 2014, and its plans for the new year.
This document is just a first step toward setting context for the many disruptions of ubiquitous and complex data, but it includes preliminary frameworks to help us examine these issues in more detail.
In my last post, I discussed some themes for 2015, one of which was an imperative for us as an industry to get serious about digital ethics.
I’m not generally a fan of annual predictions; they always remind me of a carnival in which you’re encouraged to “pay no attention to the man behind the curtain”; you almost never win the giant teddy bear.
During the past several years, the television industry has changed dramatically, spurred by device proliferation, changing distribution methods, and the increasing popularity of social media.
By now, you’ve probably heard that data scientists at Facebook recently published a study in The Proceedings of the National Academy of Science…
Late last year, I started wondering about social media command centers. Salesforce had launched one, as had Brandwatch, but I wondered: were they really still relevant? Were companies investing in command center deployments, or had interest subsided since their heyday in 2010?
In the past year, social data has continued to wend its way into organizations of all types, from large enterprise to small business to media and entertainment and the public sector. We’ve seen use cases far past marketing into product and service quality, entertainment programming, customer service, fraud detection and a host of other examples.
I spend a lot of time reading and thinking about social data: what it is, what it isn’t, how to measure it, where it’s going.
It’s a nightmare scenario. You get a frantic text or call from a co-worker that someone tweeted a tasteless joke or profanity from your corporate Twitter account.
Everyone talks about the challenges of measuring the revenue impact of social media, but how are top brands actually doing it? And are they successfully measuring ROI?
The run-up to Facebook’s IPO reminds me a bit of a wedding: everyone’s attention is on the big day (expected to be Friday May 18), without much regard for the weeks, months and years afterward.
Even though the topic of social media ROI may sometimes seem like an endless game of Whack-a-Mole [see previous post], there’s plenty of evidence to suggest we’re inching ever closer to accountability.
Wherever I go, the question I hear most often is this: “What is the ROI of social media?” Even though most companies we’ve surveyed have a brand monitoring solution in place, few have yet to crack the measurement code. It remains one of the most stubborn challenges for the social business.